Today I visited a meadow near Biebergemuend in the Hesse part of the mountain range called Spessart. On a space of about 5,000 square meters I counted about 300 Dactylorhiza fuchsii with the following distribution of flower colours (in per cent):

In total 10 of about 300 Dactylorhiza fuchsii are albiflora forms – such a frequency is quite higher than usually observed with this or other orchids species and leads to the assumption that there might be some gradual or saltational evolution under way.

Among the other plants in this area I noted Dactylorhiza majalis (withered), Dactylorhiza fuchsii x majalis, Platanthera bifolia, Neottia ovata, Rhinanthus minor, Cirsium arvense, Campanula persicifolia, Picris hieracioides and Arnica montana. Dactylorhiza majalis grows in the neighbourhood of wet ditches along the meadow – and there are also hybrids of D. majalis and D. fuchsii – still flowering while D. majalis is already withered. The hybrids are rather strong, some of them with a height of up to 50 cm. They can easily be determined by their broad leaves and the rounded labellum of the flowers with a reduced medium lobe. There is also an albiflora form of Dactylorhiza fuchsii x majalis (right).

(Source: R.M. Bateman/I. Denholm: A reappraisal of the British and Irish dactylorchids, 3. The spotted-orchids. In: Watsonia 17 (1988), p.332)
When exploring the fascinating area around the Lough Gealain and the Mullaghmore mountain these results seem to be quite realistic. In other areas as well there are many plants, which have bright or white flowers but still retain anthocyanins visible in the markings of the labellum. In a limited area of 40 square meters in the region of Rockforest, northeast of Corrofin, I counted 50 flowering Dactylorhiza fuchsii (in addition to 7 with buds) with the following characteristics:

Among the other plants in this area in the middle of a vast limestone pavement there are Orchis mascula, Geranium sanguineum, Rosa pimpinellifolia, Calluna vulgaris, Lotus corniculatus and Pteridium aquilinum.

The following image illustrates the broad variety not only of colours but also of the labellum forms of Dactylorhiza fuchsii in The Burren (some of the examples obviously showing a certain introgression with Dactylorhiza maculata). It becomes clear that most plants have less floral anthocyanins than continental populations of the species – for example the large forest populations in the French region Causses with its deep pink flowers. The pigments are first reduced in the sepals. This reduction continues in the base colour of the labellum. Then the markings of the labellum are reduced, often only a small rest is retained at the mouth of the spur. Even the very white flowers still have coloured pollinia but their colour is less intense. There is also a wide variety of labellum forms. Especially the central lobes largely differ. And there is the extreme case of a white flowering plant whose lateral lobes are reduced to a minimum (lowest row in the middle).

Most Irish and British botanists stress that the Dactylorhiza fuchsii var. okellyi (some authors view this as subspecies or even as species) must not be mixed up with the albiflora forms of fuchsii. Anne and Simon Harrap (Orchids of Britain and Ireland, 2005) are writing: “A lot of controversy surrounds okellyi” and explain: “In The Burren and elsewhere these classic white-flowered okellyi are just part of a population of plants with a variable flower colour”. Brendan Sayers and Susan Sex (Ireland’s Wild Orchids, 2008) stress that Dactylorhiza fuchsii var. okellyi flowers late, beginning in July. The photo in their field guide shows a flower with a labellum, which is deeply divided into three lobes. Charles Nelson (Wild Plants of The Burren and the Aran Islands, 2008) indicates that Dactylorhiza fuchsii f. okellyi flowers from June to August and has pure white flowers “without any pink tints or marks” and a “lip flat with 3 almost equal, deeply-cut lobes”. According to Pierre Delforge (Guide des orchidées d’Europe, 2005), who mentions a flowering period from May to July, the labellum has a maximum width of 8 mm (in contrast to fuchsii with 8-16 mm). Pat O’Reilly and Sue Parker (Wild Orchids in The Burren, 2007) have noted that “groups of pure-white orchids … are more likely to be O’Kelly’s Spotted-orchids than single plants, which might be just very pale examples of the Common Spotted-orchid”. When exploring the limestone pavements between Poulsallagh and Rockforest you’ll find lots of white-flowered Dactylorhiza fuchsii, rather small and with a pyramidal spike in the beginning of flowering, which are very similar to pink-flowered plants of the species – they should be considered as albiflora forms. Two times I found a pair of taller plants, very slender and with a distinct appearance of spike or flowers, which could be addressed as Dactylorhiza fuchsii var. okellyii.

Dactylorhiza maculata also tends to develop very pale flowers in The Burren. But most of them retain at least a faint marking on the labellum. The variety of Dactylorhiza maculata (the plants in Ireland are in general addressed as Dactylorhiza maculata ssp. ericetorum) seems to be not so wide as the variety of Dactylorhiza fuchsii. The relative frequency of Orchis mascula f. albiflora is in the same range as in continental Europe. Among thousands of plants – Orchis mascula being the most frequent orchid of the region – I’ve seen just two white ones. And there wasn’t one single albiflora form of Dactylorhiza incarnata or Dactylorhiza majalis ssp. occidentalis (on the Aran Island of Inisheer).

Compared with the relative stability of the other plants, the broad variability of Dactylorhiza fuchsii in The Burren clearly shows that this species is still in a state of an ongoing evolutionary process. It can only be speculated why Dactylorhiza fuchsii in The Burren prefers brighter or even white flowering – in the midst of an abundance of pink and purple flower colours on the meadows of the region.

A new species description offers the chance to clarify open questions while studying the alpine Nigritella flora: In the latest edition of the Journal of European Orchids (1/2010), Wolfram Foelsche describes a broad spectrum of doubtful cases where Nigritella plants have been identified as Nigritella rubra without showing the characteristics of this plant as it was described by Richard Wettstein in 1889. With Nigritella rubra sepals and petals should have about the same width. But many plants identified as Nigritella rubra have petals which are considerably slimmer than the sepals. Additionally there are also differences regarding the form of the lip and the colour of the inflorescence: In most cases the plant now described as Nigritella bicolor shows a brighter red in the lower part of the inflorescence than in its upper part. And Nigritella bicolor has a longer spur than Nigritella rubra.

“With its striking inflorescence – above a rim with brightly shining rays the rows of rose-coloured flowers are displayed while the tips of bracts are set apart in dark-red – this new species, without doubt, is our splendid, most attractive nigritella”, Foelsche writes. According to his studies the majority of the photos used to illustrate Nigritella rubra are actually showing Nigritella bicolor which has a much larger area of distribution. Foelsche notes that the bicolour characteristics may be more or less strongly developed. It’s not possible to confound Nigritella bicolor with colour varieties of Nigritella rhellicani with its open labellum:

This rare plant demonstrates that “albiflora” forms of Ophrys species tend to retain chlorophyll – in contrast to the white flowering forms of Orchis or Anacamptis species. And there are distinct areas of the flower where chlorophyll is not retained as it is the case with the labellum marking of Ophrys bertolonii. Maybe these plants tend to be “white” in order to achieve a certain biological “albiflora” function – but the chlorophyll performance of the flower is still important and thus kept. Special thanks to Pavel for contributing to albiflora.eu!

In OrchideenJournal 3/2009, Josefa and Richard Thoma describe how they have found two white flowering plants of Orchis spitzelii for the first time in a region they have been visiting for about 20 years. This location in the Alps near Salzburg is the only place where Orchis spitzelii can be found in Austria.

In June 2009, the couple counted 17 plants when Josefa was surprised to find two white flowering Orchis spitzelii. “I didn’t trust my ears”, writes Richard Thoma describing his feelings when his wife exclaimed: “Two whites!” The author named the rare color variation “Orchis spitzelii f. albovirida” – with regard to the green perigone containing chlorophyll pigments.

“Why now, of all times?”, Thoma asks and is looking forward to next year when the want to see if the white forms appear again.

Maybe it’s more than just a “freak of nature” as Thoma is assuming. More substantial research is needed to see if there is a certain function which could explain why certain orchid species develop albiflora forms. Special thanks to Richard Thoma for contributing his photos of the white flowering Orchis spitzelii to albiflora.eu.

Another example found this year in the Swiss region of Aargau is Ajuga reptans f. albiflora which has acquired some horticultural importance.

But neither the Gentianaceae nor the Labiatae (the family of the genus Ajuga) could be viewed as a family with a certain tendency towards developing white flowers – as it is the case with orchids. Maybe another family with an albiflora disposition are the Cactaceae. A charming web gallery of albiflora cacti has been set up by Gerd Weiss presenting more than 50 species.